Food Sensitivities – Should I Be Concerned?

 

Food allergy is well recognized in the medical community as a cause of acute asthma attacks, urticaria, swelling or anaphylaxis, and is found as a contributing factor in many cases of eczema or chronic nasal discharge. These types of reactions can usually be diagnosed by a thorough medical history and skin prick or IgE-radio- allergosorbent (RAST) testing.  In the strictest immunological sense, only 10-30% of food reactions involve elevation of IgE, and in the absence of such evidence the less specific diagnosis of Food Sensitivity or Intolerance is preferable.

 

Food Sensitivity/Intolerance has been the subject of controversy for many years.  Many allergists believe that only a few people have food allergies, and they have a short list of foods they routinely test believing to cause only a few possible easily predictable symptoms.  The foods most commonly tested include wheat, dairy, corn, soy, chocolate, nuts, peanuts, eggs, fish, and perhaps tomatoes.

 

Some sources estimate the prevalence of Food Sensitivity/Intolerance to occur in up to 60% of the U.S. population.  Unlike the food allergy reaction where ingestion can cause an asthmatic or anaphylactic reaction, food sensitivity reactions can seem mild and be delayed by many hours or even several days, making identification often difficult.

 

Some of the conditions found to have an association with food sensitivities include: fatigue, migraines, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, gallbladder disease, arthritis, asthma, attention deficit, eczema, fibromyalgia, psoriasis, epilepsy, otitis media, recurrent infections, mental “fog”, headaches, aphthous ulcers, nasal congestion, and a myriad of gastrointestinal complaints. 

 

From a Naturopathic perspective, foods which are not well digested or metabolized in a particular body can become a source of maldigestion, intestinal toxemia, dysbiosis, and chronic irritation to body tissues. This cascade of events will then affect or interfere with normal function of the body, and become part of the basis for chronic illness.  This makes identification of food sensitivities a first order concern when dealing with chronic complaints.

 

A food-allergic person is one who has adverse IgE-dependent reactions to specific foods.  The diagnosis can be made on clinical grounds alone and distinguished from other causes of food intolerance if the symptoms: (1) are immediate in onset (within one hour); (2) recur on challenge testing; (3) include apart from gastrointestinal disturbances, such features as lip swelling, itching, redness, anaphylaxis, asthma or eczema.

 

Delayed food allergy or sensitivities does not appear to involve IgE antibody, but rather IgG and less often IgM and IgA antibodies.  However, moderate levels of IgG don't give a clear clinical picture as increased levels indicate the body has been exposed to a reactive food even though the food clinically may not cause a problem.  However IgG is significantly involved in respiratory tract allergies, such as rhinitis, enlargement of ton­sils/adenoids, chronic cough and asthma.

 

Symptoms can be delayed from one hour to 2-3 days after consumption of the offending food(s).  Because of this delay in onset of symptoms, it is often difficult to associate the use of food with sensitivity symptoms.  This is further complicated by the tendency of people to become addicted to the foods which they are allergic.  This so-called “allergy-addiction syndrome” has been observed by many clinicians and appears consistent with Selye’s “general adaptation” response to stress.  You eat foods that cause short term relief, which later demonstrate to be the cause of your chronic symptoms. 

 

There are several methods for assessing foods to which people may adversely react.  However they all have advantages and disadvantages, and there is no simple 100% reliable clinical test available for food sensitivity testing.  Identifying the reactants that cause common symptoms is not easy because the reactions may be due to immune-mediated reactions, intestinal enzyme deficiencies, toxins, infections, neurological/psychological reactions or an unknown mechanism.

 

A comprehensive health history and food diary is often helpful, and hidden food intolerance may at times be easily discovered through an elimination diet.  After eating a hypoallergenic diet for a period of time chronic symptoms disappear, then as food is reintroduced in a systematic approach the observation of symptom return suggest intolerance.  The foods most commonly associated with Intolerance include: dairy products, wheat, eggs corn, citrus fruits, chocolate, sugar, yeast, peanuts, soy, coffee, tea, pork, rye, beef, tomato, barley, nuts, and seafood.

 

To obtain a brief description of the tests most commonly used to try to detect food sensitivities you can contact my office, as explanation is too cumbersome for this article.  These techniques include: Radio-Allergo-Sorbent Test (RAST), PRIST, Radio-Allergo-Sorbent Procedure (RASP), Enzyme Linked Serum Assay (ELISA), ELISA/ACT, Food Immune Complex Assay (FICA), Cytotoxic Testing, Sublingual Testing, Kinesiology, Neutralization Therapy, Scratch/Skin Testing, D'Adamo Blood Type, O.G. Carroll Test, and E.A.V. testing.  Each test has its attributes and short-comings involving accuracy, cost, reproducibility, and ease of testing method.

 

Experience has shown consistent positive affordable results with the E.A.V. testing method.  Electro-Acupuncture according to Voll (EAV) Testing has tested favorably against conventional testing methods, is non-invasive, and provides immediate reproducible results.

 

EAV is a non-invasive energetic evaluation of a patient using a galvanometer.  It has been used in Europe since 1953 when Dr. Reinhold Voll discovered the technique measuring energy imbalances of the body along time honored acupuncture points. In diagnosis with electro-acupuncture, a slight potential difference (voltage) is produced between a tip electrode held against an acupuncture point and a large surface electrode (hand electrode) held by the patient, the resultant resistance is then measured. 

 

EAV has shown that acupuncture points bear a direct relationship to a specific anatomical structure or physiological functions of the body, a system that evolved from centuries of Oriental acupuncture and decades of European research.  In 1992, French scientist Jean Claude Darras mapped the meridians associated with the accupoints used in a Meridian Stress Assessment, as performed in our office using a Bio-Meridian E.A.V. machine, the only FDA registered E.A.V. machine in the country.

 

Whatever clinical techniques are used in the diagnosis of food irritants, it is always necessary at some point to demonstrate a cause and effect relationship between food ingestion and the provocation of symptoms.  The exclusion of the intolerant food(s) is the most effective form of diagnosis and management making an appropriate avoidance regime essential.  Regardless of which method is used, if the offending food(s) is/are eliminated, the patient will feel better.

 

Food Allergies and Sensitivities

Related Terms

Allergies, Food

Principal Proposed Natural Treatments

Elimination Diet; Hypoallergenic Infant Formula

Other Proposed Natural Treatments

Bromelain; Proteolytic Enzymes; Thymus Extract

Page Navigation

En Espaρol (Spanish Version)

A food allergy is defined as an abnormal immune reaction caused by the ingestion of a food or food additive. The most dramatic form of food allergy reaction occurs within minutes, usually in response to certain foods such as shellfish, peanuts, or strawberries. The effects are similar to those of a bee sting allergy, involving hives, itching, swelling in the throat, and difficulty breathing; this immediate type of allergic reaction can be life-threatening.

Other food allergy reactions are more delayed, causing relatively subtle symptoms over days or weeks. 1 These include gastrointestinal problems (constipation, diarrhea, gas, cramping, and bloating), rashes, and headaches. However, because such delayed reactions are relatively vague and can have other causes, it has remained a controversial subject in medicine.

Some food allergy-like reactions do not actually involve the immune system. These are termed food sensitivities (or food intolerance). In most cases, the cause of such sensitivities is unknown.

Delayed-type food allergies and sensitivities might play a role in many diseases, including asthma, attention deficit disorder, rheumatoid arthritis, vaginal yeast infections, canker sores, colic, ear infections, eczema, irritable bowel syndrome, migraine headaches, psoriasis, chronic sinus infections, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and celiac disease. 2–9,64 However, not all experts agree; practitioners of natural medicine tend to be more enthusiastic about the food allergy theory of disease than conventional practitioners.

Conventional treatment for immediate-type food allergy reactions includes desensitization (allergy shots), emergency epinephrine (adrenaline) kits for self-injection, and the antihistamine diphenhydramine (Benadryl).

Delayed-type food allergies are much more difficult to identify and treat. Although skin and blood tests are sometimes used, their reliability is questionable. 10–16,65,66 A particular blood test called ALCAT has shown some promise, but much more study is necessary to establish its accuracy. 17 The  double-blind food challenge is the only truly reliable way to identify delayed-type food allergies. This method uses some means of disguising the food, usually by mixing it with other, non-allergenic foods. Individuals are randomly given either the food or placebo on a number of occasions separated by 1 or more days. Neither the physician nor the participant knows which is real food and which is not. Evaluation of the response can then determine whether an allergic response is really present or not. Studies suggest that perhaps only one-third of people who believe they are allergic to a given food actually experience an allergic reaction when they are given it in a double-blind fashion; in addition, reactions are often milder than individuals believe. 18,19

Although it is the most accurate way of determining food allergies, the double-blind food challenge is still mostly used in research. The elimination diet with food challenges (described below) is the most common technique in use.

Another conventional approach for delayed-type food allergies is oral cromolyn (a drug sometimes used in an inhaled form for treating asthma and other allergic illnesses). 20 A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 14 children with milk and other food allergies found that cromolyn was effective in preventing allergic reactions in 11 of 13 cases, whereas placebo was effective in only 3 of 9 cases. 21 In another study, 32 individuals were given cromolyn one half hour before meals and at bedtime. 22 If their food allergy symptoms were prevented, the participants were entered into a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study using cromoglycate. Of the 31 people who completed the study, 24 experienced relief of gastrointestinal symptoms when taking cromolyn as compared to 2 when taking placebo. In addition, systemic allergic reactions were also blocked with the cromolyn. Unfortunately, the drug also had many side effects.

Principal Proposed Natural Treatments

There are no well-documented natural treatments for food allergies. The most obvious approach would be to remove known allergenic foods from the diet. Some alternative practitioners offer lab tests to identify such allergens. However, as described above, no lab tests have been proven accurate for this purpose.

The elimination diet is another approach for identifying allergenic foods. This method involves starting with a highly restricted diet consisting only of foods that are seldom allergenic, such as rice, yams, and turkey. If dietary restriction leads to resolution or improvement of symptoms, foods are then reintroduced one by one to see which, if any, will trigger reactions. 23 There is some evidence that the elimination diet may be effective for chronic or recurrent hives; 24–26 it has been tried for many other conditions as well, including irritable bowel syndrome, 27–34asthma, 35chronic ear infections, 55,56reflux esophagitis, 36 and Crohn's disease. 37,38

Still another method involves simply eliminating the most common allergens. Cow's milk protein intolerance is thought to be the most common childhood allergy, 39 followed by allergies to eggs, peanuts, nuts, and fish. Some evidence indicates that use of special hypoallergenic infant formulas rather than cow's milk formula may help prevent eczema, urticaria, and food-induced digestive distress. 40,41,67 In addition, eliminating cow's milk from the diets of infants and their nursing mothers might reduce symptoms of infantile colic, 42–51 although not all studies have found benefit. 52–54

In hopes of preventing food allergies and diseases related to them, some authorities recommend that pregnant and breastfeeding mothers as well as their children should avoid allergenic foods. 57–61 However, it is not clear if this method actually provides any benefit. For example, one study evaluated 165 children at high risk of developing allergic symptoms. 62 Careful avoidance of allergenic foods in the diets of the mothers and infants did not reduce the later development of eczema, asthma, hay fever, or food allergy symptoms.

Other Proposed Treatments for Food Allergies and Sensitivities

Digestive enzymes such as bromelain and other proteolytic enzymes have been proposed as a treatment for food allergies, based on the reasonable idea that digesting offending proteins will reduce allergic reactions to them. However, there is no real evidence as yet that they are effective against food allergies.

Thymus extract is a supplement derived from the thymus gland of cows. Highly preliminary evidence suggests that by normalizing immune function, thymus extracts may be helpful for food allergies. 63 However, there are significant safety issues with thymus extract (see the full article for details), and this study did not prove thymus extract to be effective.

References

Carroccio A, Montalto G, Custro N, et al. Evidence of very delayed clinical reactions to cow's milk in cow's milk-intolerant patients. Allergy. 2000;55:574–579..

Nsouli TM, Nsouli SM, Linde RE, et al. Role of food allergy in serous otitis media. Ann Allergy. 1994;73:215–219.

Smith MA, Youngs GR, Finn R. Food intolerance, atopy, and irritable bowel syndrome. Lancet. 1985;2:1064.

Kitts D, Yuan Y, Joneja J, et al. Adverse reactions to food constituents: allergy, intolerance, and autoimmunity. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1997;75:241–254.

Ballegaard M, Bjergstrom A, Brondum S, et al. Self-reported food intolerance in chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32:569–571.

Pearson M, Teahon K, Levi AJ, et al. Food intolerance and Crohn's disease. Gut. 1993;34:783–787.

Ruokonen J, Paganus A, Lehti H. Elimination diets in the treatment of secretory otitis media. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1982;4:39–46.

King TS, Elia M, Hunter JO. Abnormal colonic fermentation in irritable bowel syndrome. Lancet. 1998;352:1187–1189.

Knoflach P, Park BH, Cunningham R, et al. Serum antibodies to cow's milk proteins in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 1987;92:479–485.

King HC, King WP. Alternatives in the diagnosis and treatment of food allergies. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1998;31:141–156.

Bahna SL. Management of food allergies. Ann Allergy. 1984;53:678–682.

Bindslev-Jensen C, Skov PS, Madsen F, et al. Food allergy and food intolerance—what is the difference. Ann Allergy. 1994;72:317–320.

Dainese R, Galliani EA, De Lazzari F, et al. Discrepancies between reported food intolerance and sensitization test findings in irritable bowel syndrome patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1892–1897.

Metcalfe DD. Food Allergy. Prim Care. 1998;25:819–829.

Golbert TM. A review of controversial diagnostic and therapeutic techniques employed in allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1975;56:170–190.

Zuberbier T, Chantraine-Hess S, Hartmann K, et al. Pseudoallergen-free diet in the treatment of chronic urticaria. A prospective study. Acta Derm Venereol. 1995;75:484–487.

Hoj L. Diagnostic value of ALCAT test in intolerance to food additives compared with double-blind placebo-controlled (DBPC) oral challenges [abstract]. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996;97:336.

Rodriguez J, Crespo JF, Burks W, et al. Randomized, double-blind, crossover challenge study in 53 subjects reporting adverse reactions to melon (Cucumis melo). J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106:968–972.

Geha RS, Beiser A, Ren C, et al. Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-challenge evaluation of reported reactions to monosodium glutamate. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106:973–980.

Bahna SL. Management of food allergies. Ann Allergy. 1984;53:678–682.

Kocoshis S, Gryboski JD. Use of cromolyn in combined gastrointestinal allergy. JAMA. 1979;242:1169–1173.

Gerrard JW. Oral cromoglycate: its value in the treatment of adverse reactions to foods. Ann Allergy. 1979;42:135–138.

King HC, King WP. Alternatives in the diagnosis and treatment of food allergies. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1998;31:141–156.

Zuberbier T, Chantraine-Hess S, Hartmann K, et al. Pseudoallergen-free diet in the treatment of chronic urticaria. A prospective study. Acta Derm Venereol. 1995;75:484–487.

Juhlin L. Additives and chronic urticaria. Ann Allergy. 1987;59:119–123.

Supramaniam G, Warner JO. Artificial food additive intolerance in patients with angio-oedema and urticaria. Lancet. 1986;2:907–909.

Smith MA, Youngs GR, and Finn R. Food intolerance, atopy, and irritable bowel syndrome. Lancet. 1985;2:1064.

McKee AM, Prior A, and Whorwell PJ. Exclusion diets in irritable bowel syndrome: are they worthwhile? J Clin Gastroenterol. 1987;9:526–528.

Jones VA, McLaughlan P, Shorthouse M, et al. Food intolerance: a major factor in the pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome. Lancet. 1982;2:1115–1117.

Parker TJ, Naylor SJ, Riordan AM, et al. Management of patients with food intolerance in irritable bowel syndrome: the development and use of an exclusion diet. J Hum Nutr Diet. 1995;8:159–166.

Ballegaard M, Bjergstrom A, Brondum S, et al. Self-reported food intolerance in chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32:569–571.

Dainese R, Galliani EA, De Lazzari F, et al. Discrepancies between reported food intolerance and sensitization test findings in irritable bowel syndrome patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1892–1897.

King TS, Elia M, Hunter JO. Abnormal colonic fermentation in irritable bowel syndrome. Lancet. 1998;352:1187–1189.

King TS, Elia M, Hunter JO. Abnormal colonic fermentation in irritable bowel syndrome. Lancet. 1998;352:1187–1189.

Onorato J, Merland N, Terral C, et al. Placebo-controlled double-blind food challenge in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986;78:1139–1146.

Hill DJ, Heine RG, Cameron DJ, et al. Role of food protein intolerance in infants with persistent distress attributed to reflux esophagitis. J Pediatr. 2000;136:641–647.

Pearson M, Teahon K, Levi AJ, et al. Food intolerance and Crohn's disease. Gut. 1993;34:783–787.

King TS, Elia M, Hunter JO. Abnormal colonic fermentation in irritable bowel syndrome. Lancet. 1998;352:1187–1189.

Carroccio A, Montalto G, Custro N, et al. Evidence of very delayed clinical reactions to cow's milk in cow's milk-intolerant patients. Allergy. 2000;55:574–579.

Niggemann B, Binder C, Dupont C, et al. Prospective, controlled, multi-center study on the effect of an amino-acid-based formula in infants with cow's milk allergy/intolerance and atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2001;12:78–82.

Kramer MS, Chalmers B, Hodnett E, et al. Promotion of breastfeeding intervention trial (PROBIT). JAMA. 2001;285:413–420.

Jakobsson I, Lindberg T. Cow's milk proteins cause infantile colic in breast-fed infants: a double-blind crossover study. Pediatrics. 1983;71:268–271.

Iacono G, Carroccio A, Montalto G, et al. Severe infantile colic and food intolerance: a long-term prospective study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1991;12:332–335.

Gerrard JW. Allergies in breastfed babies to foods ingested by the mother. Clin Rev Allergy. 1984;2:143–149.

Sampson HA. Infantile colic and food allergy: fact or fiction? J Pediatr. 1989;115:583–584.

Lothe L, Lindberg T. Cow's milk whey protein elicits symptoms of infantile colic in colicky formula-fed infants: a double-blind crossover study. Pediatrics. 1989;83:262–266.

Lothe L, Lindberg T, Jakobsson I. Cow's milk formula as a cause of infantile colic: a double-blind study. Pediatrics. 1982;70:7–10.

Hill DJ, Hudson IL, Sheffield LJ, et al. A low allergen diet is a significant intervention in infantile colic: results of a community-based study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995;96:886–892.

Forsyth BWC. Colic and the effect of changing formulas: a double blind, multiple crossover study. J Pediatr. 1989;115:521–526.

Warner JO. Food allergy in fully breast-fed infants. Clin Allergy. 1980;10:133–136.

Isolauri E. The treatment of cow's milk allergy. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1995;49(Suppl 1):S49–S55.

Thomas DW, McGilligan K, Eisenberg LD, et al. Infantile colic and type of milk feeding. Am J Dis Child. 1987;141:451–453.

Taubman B. Parental counseling compared with elimination of cow's milk or soy milk protein for the treatment of infant colic syndrome: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 1988;81:756–761.

Evans RW, Allardyce RA, Fergusson DM, et al. Maternal diet and infantile colic in breast-fed infants. Lancet. 1981;1:1340–1342.

Nsouli TM, Nsouli SM, Linde RE, et al. Role of food allergy in serous otitis media. Ann Allergy. 1994;73:215–219.

Ruokonen J, Paganus A, Lehti H. Elimination diets in the treatment of secretory otitis media. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1982;4:39–46.

Arvola T, Holmberg-Marttila D. Benefits and risks of elimination diets. Ann Med. 1999;31:293–298.

Iacono G, Carroccio A, Montalto G, et al. Severe infantile colic and food intolerance: a long-term prospective study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1991;12:332–335.

Hattevig G, Sigurs N, Kjellman B. Effects of maternal dietary avoidance during lactation on allergy in children at 10 years of age. Acta Paediatr. 1999;88:7–12.

Zeiger RS, Heller S. The development and prediction of atopy in high-risk children: follow-up at age seven years in a prospective randomized study of combined maternal and infant food allergen avoidance. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995;95:1179–1190.

Zeiger RS. Dietary aspects of food allergy prevention in infants and children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;30(Suppl):S77–S86

Zeiger RS, Heller S. The development and prediction of atopy in high-risk children: follow-up at age seven years in a prospective randomized study of combined maternal and infant food allergen avoidance. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995;95:1179–1190.

Cavagni G, Piscopo E, Rigoli E, et al. Food allergy in children: an attempt to improve the effects of the elimination diet with an immunomodulating agent (thymomodulin). A double-blind clinical trial. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 1989;11:131–142.

Van Den Bogaerde J, Cahill J, Emmanuel AV, et al. Gut mucosal response to food antigens in Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16:1903–1915.

Morisset M, Moneret-Vautrin DA, Maadi F, Fremont S, et al. Prospective study of mustard allergy: first study with double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge trials (24 cases). Allergy. 2003;58:295–299.

Kim TE, Park SW, Noh G, et al. Comparison of skin prick test results between crude allergen extracts from foods and commercial allergen extracts in atopic dermatitis by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge for milk, egg, and soybean. Yonsei Med J. 2002;43:613–620.

Von Berg A, Koletzko S, Grubl A, et al. The effect of hydrolyzed cow's milk formula for allergy prevention in the first year of life: The German Infant Nutritional Intervention Study, a randomized double-blind trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111:533–534.